Yale and Harvard Law Unrank Themselves

Wall Street Journal | Editorial Board

The Editorial Board argues that the latest move by Harvard Law School and Yale Law School is “what appears to be a flight from merit and transparency” in anticipation of the SCOTUS ruling on affirmative action.

The Board argues that “[Yale Law School’s] Dean Gerken gave away the game when she wrote: ‘Today, 20% of a law school’s overall ranking is median LSAT/GRE scores and GPAs. While academic scores are an important tool, they don’t always capture the full measure of an applicant. This heavily weighted metric imposes tremendous pressure on schools to overlook promising students, especially those who cannot afford expensive test preparation courses.’”

To the Board, “sounds like cover for a desire by Yale to be free to admit students with lower test scores in service to diversity, but without taking a hit to its exclusive reputation…”

Looking ahead to the affirmative action case decisions by SCOTUS this spring, the Board argues, “This is a reminder to the [SCOTUS] Justices that college administrators will find a way to skirt any three-pronged diversity test they might devise, or some other putative judicial compromise.”

Read the Article

Related:

Previous
Previous

FAIR Advisor and HLS Alum Monica Harris (JD ‘91) Explains Why She Joined FAIR’s Team

Next
Next

A Conservative Magazine Returns to Harvard